Monday, November 4, 2013

Thomas Jefferson: Hero of Democrats Beloved by Republicans?

 
For almost two hundred years, Democrats have celebrated Jefferson.  This began in the ‘30s when FDR adopted him as the symbol of his administration.  At a 1962 White House gathering of 49 Nobel Prize recipients, President Kennedy noted that “never before had such talent been assembled in one room, except, perhaps, when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”
 
Our political propagandists from all sides have traditionally invoked the Founders as often as possible.  And why not;  is there utterance from any more current President, Cabinet Secretary or political observer that might compare?  I think not;  aside from Lincoln, of course.
 
The problem with what passes as factual reporting today, is that there is no appetite – or perhaps resource – for doing anything other than passing on the factually impaired statements of our legislators and Presidents and their staff.  Also offered are endless uttterings from anybody on the internet so long as such might agree with the biases of that particular “news” purveyor.  Newspapers in my time once hated all politicians and ridiculed their lies, half lies and cherry picking;  no more.  “Think Tanks”, originally established to get the facts straight in order to support good governance, are now too often just propaganda factories – and there are so many, it is beyond the average individual to know which few might be trusted.
 
I’m a big believer in American Exceptionalism so I love to see the Founders and Federalist Papers invoked.  But for the propagandists, invoking the Founders has become problematic.  First of all we don’t seem to teach either American history or civics anymore so the unwashed masses don’t know who these people are. 
 
One of my Grandsons informed me that the Constitution is out of date.  I asked for the name of his high school civics teacher so I could find him and beat the snot out of him.
 
By the way, American Exceptionalism has nothing to do with Americans somehow being better than somebody else.  This is a fact, even though the President and former Constitutional Law teacher has told the world otherwise.  Presidents should have better advisors or stop straying from the teleprompter.
 
American Exceptionalism is about our singular system of democracy and its elevation of individual liberty over the tyranny of the majority.
 
Look it up.
 
Anyway besides general ignorance, the propagandists find it awkward to be quoting the same guy as the enemy.  Cherry picking is the answer to that of course, at least until your guy’s quotes are better for the other side.
 
Thus we can return to Jefferson who is now widely quoted by the right.  The rising Republican force used to be the Bible-thumpers for whom Jefferson’s Deism was a problem.  But now we have the Libertarians rising and much of Jefferson feels contemporary.  Consider these quotes:
 
·       When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.
 
·       The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
 
·        It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes.  A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
 
·        I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
 
·        My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
 
·        No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
 
·       The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
 
·       The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
 
·       To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
 
·       I believe banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies;  and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.
 
[Note:  I have removed the quotation marks from these statements because while most are confirmed accurate, many are also paraphrased.  A few are disputed.  However in my considered opinion, all of these statements accurately represent not only Jefferson’s views but also a reasonable paraphrase of what he wrote.  The links for all of this are listed below so that everyone can decide for themselves.]
 
Cherry picked or not, these thoughts – selected by Cal Thomas, I think – feel timely and they will be uncomfortable for today’s progressives.  We’ll have to see if Jefferson remains respected by the activists or if he’s summarily dumped along with the other contemporary human centrist detritus.
 
 

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Obama Exacerbates Race Tensions

 
This column states exactly what my wife and I have been saying to one another about both race and the President’s contributions since Trayvon.
 
Obama’s Race Remarks Exacerbate Tensions
By Kathleen Parker, Published: August 23, Washington Post
 
Parker leaves out the President’s statement from the White House that while he didn’t know all the facts it was clear that the Cambridge police acted stupidly with his friend Gates.  That time too he went on to explain how racism continues in the country as evidenced by the actions of police and little old ladies.
 
 
Parker also left out candidate Obama’s defense of the awful Reverend Wright during which he threw his grandmother under the bus.  It's ok to cringe at the awful things Gates says because his gramma used to says things that made him cringe too.  Please.
 
The racism grievance factory is of course mostly aimed at gaining political advantage.  And those folks are anxious to replace the now disgraced Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson school of political gain by guilt and extortion.  The bigger problem is that too much of the farther left – the progressives – cling to the notion that the black underclass are victims;  they believe this stuff.  We can’t have otherwise intelligent citizens drinking this kool-aide and expect to make progress. 
 
Genesis for this school of thought goes as follows.  After the civil war, slaves were free but their survival depended upon working for wages for former slave owners in the south.  They were not really free and were very poor.  The result for some or maybe many ex-slaves was segregated communities of black workers – and non-workers – who lived without marriage and with no respect for the law.  Black on black crime was often forgiven because white farm owners would demand that the sheriff ignore the crime – the worker could not be spared or replaced.  All this generated the culture we see today in underclass black communities.  Thus today’s circumstances are a legacy of racism and the responsibility of the greater community and not the responsibility of the “victims” living in poverty in black neighborhoods.
 
Even if you buy the argument that slavery and Jim Crow ruined people;  that they had no choice back then but to ignore marriage, family, morality and law;  exactly when do people become responsible for themselves?  We all know folks who live unhappy or semi-addicted lives who blame their parents or their experiences and we know that at some point their condition is solely a result of choices they themselves make.  We have no problem understanding that we can’t solve the problems those folks face.  The same is true for those caught in a culture of poverty;  at some point, lack of personal responsibility is the problem and people have to help themselves.  Our “help” must be aimed at education and opportunity, not handouts.
 
In my view, support programs that involve only wealth transfer, simply make the problems worse.  Ditto for rebranding personal responsibility as blaming the victim.  If we are to solve these problems, we’ll at least need to base policy making on facts and plain language.  And we all should care.  Nobody wants to see American neighborhoods that look like those in Mexico, Haiti, Somalia, Palestine or wherever.  What happens in one culture will soon spread to more neighborhoods.
 
Our black skinned President, raised by whites in white neighborhoods to be white, has chosen to be black.  Why would he do that if being black is a daily hell of discrimination?  In any case, he’s not helping.
 
 
 
You might also appreciate Douthat’s take:
 
A Different Kind of Division
By Ross Douthat
Published: August 24, 2013, NYT

Sunday, July 28, 2013

The Cluster Box

 
Here’s an informative column, written with a smile.
 
Goodbye, Mail Carrier; Hello, Cluster Mailboxes
By Bob Greene, CNN
Sun July 28, 2013
 
Just a two questions:
 
1.      If the cluster-putzed Congress won’t allow the end of Saturday delivery, how are we going to get to cluster boxes?
 
2.      If all this saves $4 billion a year and they’re losing $16 billion a year, shouldn’t we just shut their doors now?  Or maybe keep the USPS and close down Congress?

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Stand Your Ground

 
Recently passed stand-your-ground legislation is no doubt mostly motivated by the political grandstanding of legislators.  Never the less, I would stress that we should remember these few things:
 
1.      The primary mainstream objective of this type of legislation is to protect the law abiding both from prosecution for defending their home and themselves – “failing in their duty to retreat” – and from law suits brought by criminals after they were injured during the commission of a crime.  These are damned worthy objectives.
 
2.      Many states have versions of these laws including California and Massachusetts so it’s not really just about the NRA crazies. 
 
3.      And it’s not just about guns either.  If you hit a home invader with a bat, a carjacker with a tire iron or mace a purse snatcher or rapist – anywhere – you don’t want to be either sued or prosecuted no matter what happened to the perp.
 
4.      There is zero evidence, of any kind, that stand-your-ground legislation is about blacks in any way.
 
But here’s the rub as I see it.  Our legislators – mostly lawyers – don’t seem to have the competence to write laws any more. 
 
·         In Florida, drug dealers are able to shoot it out in the streets and claim immunity from all harm done, even to bystanders.
 
·         In South Carolina, a man murdered a home owner during a home invasion.  He admits to all of this but wants immunity from prosecution under the state’s stand-your-ground law because he was afraid the homeowner would kill him.
 
The SC State Supreme Court says he has a right to be heard in this argument.
 
Wouldn’t it seem obvious to you that there is no immunity for those committing a crime?  Doesn’t it seem equally obvious that we retain responsibility for all harm we do to bystanders?  It’s fine with me for drug dealers and gang bangers to kill each other and then go free to kill some more evil doers but if they harm innocents, that’s at least manslaughter and innocent victims should be able to sue them and maybe take away their gold teeth and Uzis.
 
Shouldn’t a legislator – let alone a lawyer – be able to get that into the law in the first place?
 
I hate bringing Martin/Zimmerman into this;  it was the South Carolina Supreme Court that got me to the keyboard.  But given the heat of the moment, it seems impossible for me to write this and avoid that case.  Consider this:
 
·         If your daughter maces an attacker, with no witnesses or cameras around, and the guys dies of an asthma attack or allergic reaction, what process and penalty do you want to apply to her?  Make it your son, who is white, and make the dead guy black.  Same question. 
 
·         We don’t know what exactly went down with Martin/Zimmerman but a jury has decided and some people would be very upset if Zimmerman was now headed to 30 years for manslaughter.  Innocent until proven guilty and the state has to prove things beyond a reasonable doubt.  No witnesses means plenty of doubt and no way to convict.
 
·         If Zimmerman was not armed, I doubt that anybody would be dead.  But this is America.  Bad guys have guns and there is nothing anyone can do about that.  Good guys have guns too.  Personally, I like the line from a favorite movie called “Nobody’s Fool”.  A judge says that if we arm one moron, we have to arm them all.  That seems right.  Suck it up and focus on the things we can change.
 
·         The press and the activists made this case what it has become.  If it was just another case of black on black, nobody would take any notice.  Oh yeah and in Florida, the black neighborhood watch person would never have been prosecuted.
 
If you look at my Martin/Zimmerman comments, you’ll see that the majority have nothing to do with stand-your-ground legislation and the one that does suggests an important need for such laws.  How did we ever get to a place where self defense could be a crime or liability?
 
So let’s get the laws right and move on.

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Syria is a Serious Problem

 
Any conservative worth the label should be against intervention in another nation’s troubles. 
 
Today’s sham version of conservatism seems to include only Bible thumpers yearning to bring democracy and Christ to the savages at the point of an armed drone and the near-anarchist libertarian wing nuts.
 
Meanwhile, traditional American liberalism has been overrun by the pinko-commie progressives – AKA the DDGs [delusional do-gooders] – who must forswear all combat when they undergo the lobotomy required for ordination in the hydra-cult of progressivism.
 
Completing the political soup in which the nation currently simmers is the least capable President in a lifetime and a nearly lone advocate for Syrian intervention [John McCain] who has almost no remaining credibility whatsoever.
 
If you are trying to ignore the Iranian bomb and Assad’s Syria, good for you but I think these two situations are as critical to the nation as any of Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan 1, Iraq 1, Bosnia, Iraq 2, or Afghanistan 2.  There are barely two American choices in those examples that don’t seem to be folly today.  Perhaps the easiest path regarding Syria now is resigned apathy but if you have an interest, I offer two excellent opinion columns.
 
Can Iran be stopped?
Economist, Jun 22nd 2013
 
After 150 Years, the Choices Made At Gettysburg Still Reverberate
By George F. Will,   Washington Post, June 30
 
George Will, true conservative, is against foreign engagements and says so often.  He also points out that we are powerless to prevent an Iranian bomb – the Economist agrees – and that the evils of involvement in Syria cannot possibly be offset by any plausible reason for such – the Economist disagrees.  Still I cannot help wondering whether this Will column about Gettysburg argues, by inference, for Syrian intervention.
 
“Studying history serves democracy by highlighting contingencies: Things did not need to turn out the way they did;  choices matter.”
 
The only thing I can be sure of in the moment is that politicizing foreign policy is as detrimental to the nation as it can get. 
 
Intervention in Korea created yet another shining example of capitalism over communism but should we have stopped before winning?  On the other hand, is America better off with the Korean situation today than we are with the current capitalists in Vietnam?  What did helping Afghanistan against the Russians get us?  Perhaps the collapse of the Soviets?  Booting the Taliban from power was necessary and painless but everything after that in Afghanistan 2 is a waste.  Iraq 2 is obviously a disaster – that nation hates us, is an economic and political mess and is now allied with Iran.  Of course we finally finished Iraq 1;  we're out the no-fly zone business there and Saddam is no longer paying Palestinians to blowup Israeli children.
 
Russia, Iran, Hezbollah and Syria are at war and they intend to win.  American is as unserious about that as we could ever be.  Handing a military victory to Iran, Hezbollah, Putin and Assad cannot be a good thing for America or peace or democracy.  But is a better outcome from our involvement plausible?  Such decisions should be made by experts without input from the partisans, crazies and populists.  The sausage-making should be conducted behind closed doors with the conclusion explained to the nation afterward and without dissent – think of how the Fed works.
 
If the conclusion is to make war, then the Congress should declare it and support it.  Bombing, drone attacks, arming rebels and serious sanctions, let alone invasions, are all acts of war.  The government should follow the Constitution and put war making Presidents back in their box.  And when we declare war, we should fight to win and leave the political bickering for other topics until it’s over.  We need the boys and girls in the Congressional kindergarten to grow up.  If only there were some competence in the White House to lead us.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

The Worst President since Jimmy Carter

 
W. clearly had this title sewed up;  one hoped for generations to come.  But the ever competitive Barack Obama looks to overtake Bush in a walk.  Back to back disasters staggering our great nation.  It is interesting to remember the hatred for the awful Bush while watching the lack thereof for a President who perpetuates all of Bush’s policies – while steadfastly claiming he hasn’t – and occasionally making things even worse.
 
Try these two excellent columns:
 
Obama Hits a Wall in Berlin
By George F. Will,   Washington Post, June 20, 2013
 
The Great Disconnect
By Ross Douthat, NYT, June 22, 2013
 
Nobody does sarcasm like George Will;  he’s a pleasure to read.  Between them, these two men on, separate days, point out that that our political class out of control;  dysfunctional on both sides but sadly not sufficiently so as to at least stop making things worse.  Put down the shovel please.
 
There will be no work on the big issues of our time, jobs, the economy, entitlements, the tax code and corporate welfare.  Personally, I’d like to see an immigration bill but the excellent bill crushed by Republicans in 2007 has been replaced by a disaster – no doubt this one will pass.
 
The President intends to use his Executive Branch authority to push the climate crazy agenda despite 16 years of no warming and the fact that these moves will cost jobs.
 
I have always hated the climate propaganda that claims “all scientists agree” – they don’t – and says their critics are “science deniers” when the reverse is the actual case.  Thus I love it when Will points out the President’s – and the true believers’ – “strange understanding of respect for science ... forswears skepticism".
 
And don’t miss Douthat’s punch line:
 
“Republicans [are] … sticking with an agenda that’s even more disconnected from the anxieties of the average voter than the White House’s second-term priorities.  Their assumption seems to be that eventually the public will simply have to turn to them.”
 
Turn to whom?  Sarah Palin?  Michelle Bachman?  Eric Canter?  Don’t bet on it.  In what way exactly are these jerks different from Nancy Pelosi?
 
It’s past time for Congress to try governing.

Friday, April 5, 2013

The New Three R’s: Racism, Reproduction and Recycling

 
George Will says that “consciousness-raising” is the politically correct term for “propaganda” in the progressive mind and with funding from the federal government they are probably bringing this to a school near you.
 
Schools push a curriculum of propaganda
By George F. Will
Washington Post, April 3, 2013 
 
Take the time to read this thing.  What do you think of teachers telling school children that they have insufficient guilt about having white skin?  How does such a program fit with the morons who believe requiring a child to learn might damage the kid’s self esteem?
 
Highlights:
 
Wisconsin’s Department of Public Instruction in collaboration with the federal program VISTA [Volunteers in Service to America but the “volunteers” are paid] urged white students to wear white wristbands “as a reminder about your privilege, and as a personal commitment to explain why you wear the wristband.”
 
A flyer distributed at a DPI-VISTA training class urged whites to “put a note on your mirror or computer screen as a reminder to think about privilege,” to “make a daily list of the ways privilege played out” and to conduct an “internal dialogue” asking questions such as “How do I make myself comfortable with privilege?” and “What am I doing today to undo my privilege?”
 
After criticism erupted, the DPI dishonestly claimed that the wristbands were a hoax perpetrated by conservatives. But the flyer DPI used explicitly advocated the wristbands and Wisconsin’s taxpayer-funded indoctrination continues, funded by more than Wisconsin taxpayers.
 
Today, the school systems in 20 states employ more non-teachers than teachers.  Between 1950 and 2009, while the number of K-12 students increased 96 percent, full-time-equivalent school employees increased 386 percent.  The number of teachers increased 252 percent, but the number of bureaucrats — including consciousness-raising sensitivity enforcers and other non-teachers — increased 702 percent.  States could have saved more than $24 billion annually if non-teaching staff had grown only as fast as student enrollment.  Americans wonder why their schools have done so little to improve reading, math and science scores.
 
President Reagan said: “If you serve a child a rotten hamburger in America, federal, state and local agencies will investigate you, summon you, close you down, whatever.  But if you provide a child with a rotten education, nothing happens, except that you’re liable to be given more money to do it with.”
 
N and I often wonder why diversity Nazis never demand that all-black public housing include a proportionate share of white folks and other races.  Are all-black colleges sufficiently diverse?  How about black caucuses?

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Men Who Do More Housework Have Less Sex

 
I thought it essential to alert everyone of this critically important scientific study.  N says it was done by men and they made it all up.
 
Men Who Do More Housework Have Less Sex
By Rebecca Coffey
Scientific American Magazine
March 30, 2013

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Time for Substance in Politics

 
This column is a modestly difficult read.  Not long, just complex and a little esoteric for some.  But if you think government is currently messed up and especially if you think government or process is irretrievably damaged, this is worth a read.  For me of course, the column grinds some of my favorite axes.
 
For GOP Substance, Deregulate
By George Will, The Washington Post
March 24, 2013 
 
 
Allow me to paraphrase – redundantly if you’re nuts enough to read my posts.  We are the problem.
 
  • The two most powerful and damaging lobbies in the nation are the Democrats and Republicans.  Both are radical and growing worse.
  • The Parties control government and they regularly pass incumbent protection legislation.  Over the centuries, this has defeated too much of the Framer’s intent which was to protect America from the basic nature of human beings.
  • Americans no longer consider our system of government exceptional;  we allow Congress to abdicate its responsibilities to the Executive and the Courts;  we happily encourage Presidents and Courts to make law;  we think the Constitution is obsolete;  we think the Electoral College and the Senate are undemocratic;  we don’t even bother to teach our exceptional system to our school children.
  • We have taken sides in the propaganda war between the ruling Parties and in the process we have elevated opportunists and the fringe detritus of our population.  We have abdicated our common sense to intellectual midgets.  We equate popular opinion with governing and join cults.
 
The solutions to our problems lie in returning to common sense and American governmental basics. 
 
  • Local government must be primary.  We send tax dollars to Washington so that distant legislators can decide how we should feed our poor and heal our sick and how much money we need to spend in order to do those things.  What are we thinking?
  • Individual liberty must again become the underlying principle in governing.  How can a nation that was enlightened by the 18th Amendment conceive of “The War on Drugs” let alone pursue it without Constitutional challenge and perpetuate it even in its obvious, continuous and inevitable failure?  
  • I do not advocate isolationism but how can any nation enlightened by Korea and Vietnam continue to invade foreign nations without a Congressional declaration of war?  Personally, I would advocate a mandatory war tax to fully pay for any foreign military engagements.  And yes, bombing a foreign nation is an act of war regardless of whether the pilot is on the plane or sitting in a trailer in Texas.  I support Bush and Obama using drones against terrorists but not without Congress giving official authorization.
  • No lobby should have government-given advantage over the others.
  • We should all vote at the same time and for any candidate that can demonstrate credibility.
We should be appalled by the process we witnessed in selecting candidates for President in 2012 and we should be deeply ashamed of the caliber of those candidates.  This reflects on us.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Cyprus – Yet Another Cautionary Example

 
My progressive friends have fallen for Paul Krugman – the Keynesian socialist – who maintains two outrageous positions:
 
1.     The best way to achieve the progressive agenda is to have government spend the nation into fiscal catastrophe.  At that point Americans will surely adopt the solutions chosen in Europe – or perhaps even Venezuela.
 
2.      Deficits do not matter.  We are the world currency;  we can print money forever;  these conditions will always prevail.  Ya know, like housing prices will never decline.
 
That otherwise intelligent people listen to this crap is exactly the same condition as my many friends who find Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glen Beck credible. 
 
We’re not Greece my lefty friends tell me.  OK, but how did Greece become Greece?
 
Now if you haven’t paid attention to the latest Euro blowup in Cyprus, you should.
 
Cyprus Bailout Incites Turmoil as Blame Flies
By James Kanter, Nicholas Kulish and Andrew Higgins
NYT:  March 18, 2013
 
In case you don’t read the column, Cyprus is bankrupt and the EU has decided – practically overnight – that the solution is to “tax” the savings account of every bank depositor in the nation.  If the Cyprus government refuses, then Brussels won’t bailout the country and real chaos will ensue – yes, savers could lose everything in a national default.
 
·         How did Cyrus get to this point where the debt is too big to service?  [Please.  Spare me the drivel.  Cyrus spent more than it earned;  a lot more;  and over an extended period of time.]
 
·         Who is expected to pay down the debt;  in this case;  in every case;  in every nation?  The answer is always the working middle class.
 
·         Can government suddenly seize part of your savings in accounts guaranteed safe by the government?  Not in America, right?  If the alternative is chaos, you better believe it.
 
·         Is it people with savings accounts that caused the problem?
 
·         What will be the result of closing the Cyprian banks and proposing this “solution”?  Capital will flee.  Collapse will be more certain.  Recovery that much more distant.
 
·         Who thought of this awful thing?  It was European “capitalists” and the IMF.  But it can’t happen here.
 
So, back to Paul Krugman and the foolish folks who buy the argument that America is exempt from Economics 101.  Did you notice the contradiction in the Krugman rules?  America will never go bankrupt he says.  But his plan is to plunge the nation in crisis so that we’ll finally “do the right things”.  Hmmm …
 
Personally, I think most progressives are just dumb.  They’re like the Michele Bachman and Ron Paul fans, they mean no harm, they’re just dumb – they drank their team’s kool-aid.  Krugman however is a smart pinko-commie with an agenda and a growing following of people who should know better.  I realize that Republicans make it easy for this fringe looney to look sensible by comparison.  But never forget that these people will not only squander all the golden eggs, they’ll happily eat the golden goose as well.
 
Want more?  Look at Brook’s evaluation of the budget produced by the Congressional Progressive Caucus last week.
 
The Progressive Shift
By David Brooks
NYT:  March 18, 2013

Monday, March 11, 2013

America’s Exceptionalism under Fire

 
There have always been modestly informed adults who forgot some of the civics they were taught in school and fell for the idea that the Electoral College was “undemocratic” and therefore somehow bad;  better to elect presidents by popular vote we’re told.  This nonsense never led anywhere because our leaders knew better.
 
But today, the ascendancy of progressives and their do-gooder allies is bringing the exceptional American system of government under threat and even ridicule.  Otherwise intelligent people are beginning to listen to such drivel.  My grandson is persuaded that the Constitution of the United States of America is document out of date.  Apparently my younger grandchildren aren’t even taught civics anymore.  More and more fools are not only attacking the Electoral College, now they find it “unfair” or “undemocratic” that small states have as many Senators as large ones. 
 
Consider this lengthy opinion piece from the front page of the New York Times written by the lefty Adam Liptak.  This guy has a wide audience;  he teaches at several of our elite lefty colleges and writes for influential lefty magazines.
 
Smaller States Find Outsize Clout Growing in Senate
By Adam Liptak
NYT, 3/11/13
 
The Founders were above all else concerned that that America would never again be under the thumb of a dictator.  And in the pursuit of this objective, their bedrock priority was individual liberty which they ingeniously sought to protect from both government and “the tyranny of the majority”.  They never believed in “pure” democracy and neither should we. 
 
“Populism” is dangerous – think Hitler, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot and so many others – do you really believe that German, Russian or Chinese people were bad or dumb?  Collectively, people are often spectacularly dumb in any given moment.  Individually we are always self interested and worse.  People are flawed and the Founder’s exceptional form of government protects us from ourselves better than any other system on the planet.
 
The Founder’s strongly advised against political Parties and today we can see their wisdom better than ever.  Federal government dysfunction is widely seen and hotly detested at the moment but it’s not the Founder’s system of government that’s broken.  Far from it, the Founder’s system is arguably protecting us from getting worse faster.  Checks and balances are a good thing.  Deliberation is at least of help, even for idiots.
 
What’s broken is our political system.  We’ve allowed the major political Parties to become the most powerful, entrenched and destructive two lobbies in the nation.  Our primary system allows the candidates for office to be selected for Party loyalty above the good of the community.  By the time the nation votes, radical political monopolies have eliminated the suitable candidates.  Once in place, legislators more and more work for their Party and some vaguely defined and incredibly malleable “principles” over the simple good of the nation.  If fact, the Party system has degraded the caliber of our legislators and at the same time shifted from offering solutions to problems to the perpetual demonization of the opposition. 
 
And we fall for it.  We have taken sides with one or the other tribe of morons and opportunists.  Can you believe that Rush Limbaugh has 22 million listeners?  Do you think that the likes of Michele Bachman, Herman Cain or Rick Santorum are of legislative caliber, let alone Presidential?  Do progressives and climate crazies represent the will of America?  They say they do.
 
Sandra Day O’Conner – former Supreme Court Justice – is so appalled at the ignorance of our citizens about our system of government that she has started iCivics.  It’s a 50 state effort to begin teaching civics in our schools again.  More power to her because kids can’t even name the three branches of government let alone understand and defend the objectives in the Federalist papers.
 
Ask yourself these questions for a start:
 
1.      Is government by referendum – i.e. “pure” democracy – a better idea than representative government? 
 
2.      Would the nation be better off if we did everything the way New York City, California or perhaps Texas says we should?  How about the Detroit way or the Arizona way?
 
3.      Do we approve of Presidents invading sovereign nations or should Congress declare war first?  If Congress passes a law, does the President have to implement it or can he modify it with signing letters?
 
4.      Have you thought about a third political Party as a possible way to break the Democrat/Republican monopoly?  If so, how do you think we should resolve a 34/33/33 popular vote result in a Presidential election?
 
5.      Can you move from a densely populated city to Fargo North Dakota?  Can you do the reverse?  
 
6.      Should government buy companies?
 
7.      Should government design stuff such as cars, light bulbs or toilets?
 
8.      Do you like the war on drugs?  Farm subsidies?  How about the Defense of Marriage Act?
 
You get the idea, I hope.  Progressives are in ascendance at the moment and with the excellent support of Republicans, we can expect that they’ll accumulate even more power.  Perhaps you like that but remember, someday it could be the Tea Party or the Ku Klux Klan or PETA or any group.  What do you think about facing these challenges after we eliminate the Senate and let the House make all the laws?